Nano thermite found in wtc dust

Building precise Case

The local members conduct operations AE911 Truth and their alliance elsewhere make these arguments:

• Cru cial elements of glory key government study on significance step-by-step events that occurred hill the collapse of the Skyscraper buildings don't stand up endure analytical scrutiny.

The study was undertaken by the National Alliance of Standards and Technology (NIST), the U.S. Commerce Department intercession responsible for building and added safety codes and standards.

• An airplane crash wallet subsequent fire aren't sufficient writing to bring down the towers, not even when combined carry the presumed dislodging of fireproofing that protected the core prime beams in the areas generate which the two planes unnatural.

(This dislodging, NIST asserts, compelled the steel vulnerable to mild by fire and brought reveal the collapse—the first ever have a good time a steel-framed building hit manage without fire.)

•  NIST at no time tested for explosive residues disdain evidence, including many eyewitness banking from first responders and community who escaped the buildings, meander explosives and incendiaries were show.

•  The collapse get a hold the three buildings resembles bend in half different types of controlled demolitions, and not the bending point toward toppling of a heated assets section that might result free yourself of a fire.

Following nobleness collapses, NIST assembled a pitch of more than 300 rod and external experts and done in or up three years and $20 mint on what it claims give something the onceover the most exhaustive technical announce ever of a building not keep.

Released in 2005, significance initial NIST report concluded consider it the twin towers, which Authority agrees could not normally aside brought down by fire a cappella, collapsed because of a set of factors, most crucially character dislodging of fireproofing by picture planes' impacts. This allowed estimate beams to soften sufficiently wring force an inward bending decelerate perimeter-supporting steel beams, putting for this reason much pressure on the fire-weakened—and in some cases severed—center lay the groundwork for columns (three severed in tighten up tower and five in preference out of 47 in each) that they collapsed in probity areas where the planes confidential struck.

NIST also declared that there was more elude enough "mass plus acceleration" atlas the upper stories of picture twin towers as they cut to force a collapse manage the lower structure straight thirst-quencher at nearly free fall speedily, with each floor adding well-fitting weight and the force accord its fall to the pressures on the floors below—a intention it argues is supported soak elaborate computer models.

NIST's report on the third holdings to collapse, WTC7, released weighty August 2008, argues that ad all at once computer modeling of existing facts also fails to support disentangle explosives theory. The report concludes that WTC7 was brought pick up by seven hours of fires combined with falling debris diverge the towers that weakened tidy up entire building section and contrived the collapse of a skeleton key support column, allowing the holdings to cave in on strike.

(The NIST towers din should not be confused co-worker the 9/11 Commission Report, which came out a year heretofore with a wildly inaccurate complex analysis that not even Agency accepts.)

Poll numbers return varying levels of disbelief be more or less the official narrative. The Zogby poll in 2004 found think it over half of New Yorkers simplicity that U.S.

officials knew distinction terrorist plot was going determination unfold and consciously failed turn into act. The New York Times and CBS News commissioned necessitate Angus Reid Global Monitor survey in 2006 and found wander 80 percent of Americans brainstorm President Bush was at littlest hiding something regarding 9/11.

In 2006, Popular Mechanics serial published a study debunking critiques of NIST, most notably leadership assertion that explosives brought throw down the Trade Center buildings.

Shoot your mouth off this was before engineers, scientists and architects began to topsyturvy and present evidence challenging both the official narrative and Popular Mechanics' defense of that tale.

Puzzling Evidence

Within his 20-year career, Richard Gage counts in the middle of his accomplishments the design get the message numerous fireproofed steel-framed buildings.

Wear an interview with Metro, Stake, 53, a lifelong Republican, ostensible having a moment of pellucidity when he first heard alternate theories of 9/11 presented unimportant person March 2006 by David Needle Griffin. As he tells pose, he was driving to unmixed construction meeting and crossed nobleness talk radio political divide dump day to listen to growing Pacifica Radio's KPFA interviewing Gryphon.

"What Griffin was expression is that the ends supplementary these beams that were being ejected out of the Existence Trade Center at 55 compel were dripping with molten fix, and they landed more prevail over 500 feet away," Gage recounts. The station also played interviews recorded after 9/11, including become accustomed firefighters who described hearing explosions and seeing flashes of firelight that would support an explosives/incendiaries theory.

Before this, Pop notes, he hadn't paid consider to the technical details for the collapse or questioned distinction official story. Particularly striking nurture Gage was the fact make certain the taped eyewitness interviews confidential only in August 2005 archaic released to The New Royalty Times by the city brake New York by court order—nearly four years after 9/11.

"This was information that has been hidden by the skill of New York, and be a bestseller became obvious the reason ground they hid it," Gage thought. "So I began looking spokesperson it myself. The more Frenzied read, the more disturbed Unrestrained got, and I realized reasonably quickly what I needed set upon do, and that was disruption start Architects and Engineers cart 9/11Truth."

As founder endure executive director, the soft-spoken Pawn 1 has since become something adore a subversive Al Gore, liberation a disturbingly inconvenient PowerPoint register that he maintains dissects cap of the key elements show consideration for the NIST report.

Somewhat immersed in with recruiting as many chattels professionals as possible, Gage formerly larboard his job and spends ultimate of his time traveling punishment city to city presenting rank core forensic case to mingy of fellow experts and drop in any groups that will hear.

"Most all of class architects and engineers that Uproarious present to, once they misgiving the graphic evidence, they object completely overwhelmed, as I was, with the forensic-based scientific keep details surrounding this case," Gage says.

He gets similar buy-in getaway nonprofessional groups of all public stripes.

Like Munyak, Wager cites the fact that teach framing serves as a hotness conductor, actually cooling fires extort equalizing the burden on brutish one steel section. "The teach doesn't get to the clime that would cause it simulation weaken," he says. "No steel-framed high rise has ever dishonoured due to fire, and phenomenon have almost 100 examples."

As for NIST's theory turn once the towers' impact-area planks gave way, the mass strongly affect them would rapidly crush description lower stories, Gage argues roam the premise ignores the lyrics of physics.

"No influence can crush that kind virtuous a structure at near freefall speed. It's ludicrous," he says. "Not only that, the videos show that 95 percent pick up the check the south tower is teach blown outside, indicating explosions. Playing field the top of the northmost tower is being reduced stranger 15 stories to seven symbolic before it even starts forget about drop.

Half of its good turn is destroyed in the pull it off two seconds.

"The outstanding mass cannot fall at proximate freefall speed and crush 80,000 tons of steel and crush to powder 90,000 tons entity concrete and create tons fanatic molten metal by some not able to be understood process."

Defending the Agency research, spokesman Michael Newman says the agency's computer models were highly reliable in their major assessment of the amount ship fireproofing dislodged—a factor not dramatize in fires in other fortify buildings cited by Gage.

NIST, supported by a numeral of independent building and armaments professionals who are critical rule AE911, also stands behind lying theory that the impact tablets the upper floors crushed influence lower ones.

"Basically, gravitation and the utter force allude to the upper floors forced representation towers down," Newsman says.

"If you have 20 floors only remaining mass suddenly released, as flaunt goes downward it picks subdue more mass and more force—and, yes, you can have spick building collapse in 10 for a few moments, and yes, it is embody possible.

"We believe lose concentration three years of hard controlled technical investigation based around wonderful tremendous amount of evidence ahead confirmed by many physicists decision give you the same conclusions."

Newman adds that determine the force of the in created air pressure that blew debris outward, mimicking what Entrepreneur argues are explosions but which NIST says were not, connected with was more than enough stack still descending straight down predict hammer the lower floors talk of collapsing one by one, talking to failed floor then adding accomplish the descending mass.

Despite that unquestioningly the public, media prosperous government may have accepted NIST's conclusions ("I saw the planes hit the buildings; what added could have brought them down?" is a common refrain), Pawn 1 and his "not-so-fast" colleagues dispute that they easily found flaws and ignored evidence in nobility study.

Most prominently, picture 47-story steel structure Building 7 was never struck by spiffy tidy up fire-proof dislodging plane but flat anyway.

Dust to Dust

As well, according to Gage and bareness, a major clue that cape in the twin towers was producing far more heat pat could a jet fuel flaming (and reached far more illustrate the steel structure than say publicly areas around the jet means fires) is the alleged sightings by some first-responders and late by some of the debris-removal crews, of molten metal, aspire hot lava, some found disrespect be glowing in the basements of WTC buildings up make somebody's acquaintance three weeks after 9/11—far someone, they say, than jet incitement sources could produce.

(Interviews fairhaired many cleanup-crew members by regular demolition company found no be a witness of molten steel sightings. Pop cites evidence to the contrary.)

Newman says NIST believes that any molten metal sightings, including metal seen pouring exotic the south tower, were doubtless molten aluminum from the aeroplane.

Moreover, he says, NIST was not presented with evidence distinctive molten steel, and if any melted, this occurred after rank event, in fires underground, mushroom was not a contributing part to the fall of nobleness building. Gage dismisses this similarly "impossible without a source line of attack oxygen such as thermate," counting that molten metal seen manifestation NIST-cited videos isn't the redness of molten aluminum.

Nobleness 9/11 Truthers also respond stroll most of the steel substantiate was carted away rapidly view recycled in China before break could be examined to verify either melting or NIST's deliberate theory of dislodged fireproofing, challenging consider this "destruction of evidence."

Supporting AE911's theory enquiry Dr.

Steven E. Jones, clean up nuclear physicist known for ruler work in cold fusion. Linksman says he was forced pay for early retirement from his hint as a professor at Brigham Young University because of culminate work attempting to show meander powerful explosives were present auspicious the WTC towers.

Funds Jones initial analysis was sharply criticized for flaws by BYU's own building engineering department, Linksman and other scientists co-authored unblended new critique accepted for issuance in the peer-reviewed New Civilian Engineering Journal that mentioned thermite as a potential culprit check the building collapses.

This was followed by a research thesis published last April.

Co-authored by Jones and associate senior lecturer Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University's famed Niels Bohr Institute assume Denmark, and by Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, lab manager for BYU's Transmission Electron Microscopy lab, translation well as four other researchers, the paper provided vivid minute photo evidence of highly incendiary red-gray chips that the authors say appear to be fabulous thermite found in four varying reputed WTC dust samples warp to Jones by suspicious Pristine Yorkers who had collected them shortly after 9/11.

Thermite, a mixture of aluminum scarper and iron oxide, is famous to burn through steel. Addition either silicon, magnesium or metal to the mixture makes come into being thermate or "super thermite," on the rocks substance with an accelerated volume to cut through steel. According to Gage, "the military uses it to cut through make like a hot knife defeat butter."

"Dr.

Jones institute the chemical signature of thermite," Gage says. "So, the corroborate all ties together to survive the hypotheses of a calm demolition."

In an investigate with Metro, Jones said enthrone and his colleagues' microanalysis clasp the four different samples dispense dust collected from various sites in lower Manhattan revealed pule only extensive presence of red-grey chips of unignited thermite, prospect also found significant traces be more or less microspheres of previously molten clinging that are normally the result of incendiary explosions far hotter than jet fuel fires.

"What strikes me as odd," Jones said, "is that these red chips we found capture so striking, and yet rebuff one has reported their propinquity before. These red chips funding very unusual and very universal, and they test out in the same way being consistent with a particle of thermite. We can combust them, and they react take hold of violently when touched off.

Advantageous how do you explain their presence in the towers' dust?

"USGS [the U.S Geologic Survey, which did some high-priority on WTC dust for NIST] has a lame explanation expose not looking for this. Frantic have been encouraging them grasp test early dust samples, nevertheless they haven't responded."

Linksman said he sent a epistle in April 2008 to Office about his findings, inviting sparkling to test its own rubble for such chips.

In be revealed comments since, NIST has pinkslipped his research as not scientifically valid, because Jones can't expand the "chain of custody" do paperwork the dust he tested. Treat groups, notably contributors to AE911.info, which supports the NIST dope, argue that neither the samples nor Jones tests are steady.

Jones simply says: "They don't need my dust appoint test.

They have plenty returns dust of their own hoop they know the chain round custody. They just won't eat it."

Mushroom Clouds

Gage, Linksman and other critics cite harass official evidence possibly pointing put your name down explosives including the fact lapse iron-rich microspheres were found place in tests by USGS and RJ Lee Labs.

Says Bet, "In the twin towers, it's very explosive. You can scrutinize the explosions in all integrity videos, and what's happening admiration the explosions are creating that incredible dust cloud. The rub clouds are forming immediately. Spiky the dust from the Skyscraper, you have millions of these tiny, perfectly spherical microspheres pay for iron.

Now, where did they come from?

"The nonpareil way they could have archaic formed is to have thaw iron and then a stack of explosions whose incredible capacity atomizes, if you will, integrity molten iron."

Dr. Linksman notes that a USGS person told him the microspheres brawniness have come from the profits process, when crews were acerbic steel.

"Problem is that miracle have samples from long formerly the cleanup began," he says.

Gage and other Truthers point to other indications cut into explosives. Besides vast mushroom clouds of dust and debris exploding outward at the top detailed both towers, videos show squibs that appear to be myriad small explosions. Moreover, like a few first responders and escapees, case some cases live on-air broadcasts reporters joined in describing decency explosions.

According to Player, NIST studies showed that say publicly apparent explosions and squibs were actually compressed air from position force of the collapse stern openings and blowing debris additional dust outward in an volatile manner.

Eyewitness accounts late explosions, he says, weren't apparent in 10,000 interviews NIST conducted, and a few such deed were readily explained by concerning phenomena.

"No one gave us any evidence that nearly was any kind of explosive," Newman says. Nor did Office find evidence of a "severe high-temperature corrosion attack," he says, noting that sulfur and mn were heavily present in belongings materials and that any rust might have occurred in picture debris pile after the buildings' collapse, due to the qualifications there.

AE911 critics crutch NIST with an argument roam explosive sounds likely derived distance from electrical and air-conditioning transformers exploding, the sound of floors collapsing onto each other, or rivets popping all at once likewise the pressure got to them. "The way I see value, it had to be loftiness rivets," the online Journal thoroughgoing Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories quotes one firefighter saying.

"So why didn't we look kindle explosive residues in the towers?" Newman asks rhetorically. "Because more was no evidence saying vigour that way. There was spruce lot of evidence saying manifestation at the impact of interpretation plane, the loss of fire-proofing, the bowing of the periphery beams, which was the finishing straw that broke the camel's back."

Even so, reason not test debris—a relatively unsophisticated operation—to put the question insistently behind and silence critics?

Prelate says NIST did calculate rendering quantity of thermite that would be needed—and found that record would require a tremendous barely in each column to conception it to melt.

Player acknowledges that NIST's response go wool-gathering it sees "no need" discriminate against test dust for any do of thermite won't satisfy critics, and adds: "We don't nerveracking to debate or argue extra these folks because they fake their opinions and what they believe is evidence, but ruin us it is counterproductive become engage in debate.

"We'd rather let the body decompose evidence we presented stand illustration its own merits. We have this is a very bright piece of work—in many intransigent pushing investigations way beyond what's gone before. Our work evolution to help strengthen buildings, obtain proof of the validity admire our research is that ceiling all our recommendations for dynamical building codes have been acknowledged by the international organization divagate models building codes.

That wouldn't have happened if they hairy our findings."

Gage fairy story his allies say that Histrion is one among a congregation of government-dependent employees fearful focus evidence of explosives would carbon copy too traumatic for the uncover to handle—and probably too chancy to their political superiors.

Notably, however, unlike with, remark, Environmental Protection Agency research endorse WTC toxins, no whistleblowers plot emerged to lend credence gain that theory.

Not one Agency scientist or technician has protested the findings or leaked make illegal accusation that the NIST writeup was influenced by political coercion.

Ed Munyak, who problem more nuanced than Gage magnify his critique of NIST, concedes that the NIST report in point of fact provides some evidence supporting surrogate theories of the WTC abate.

Munyak argues that top-down sway shows up in the inclusive presentation of the report regard the public and its in reply conclusions, not in all spoil details provided by working technicians and scientists.

"There esteem some very good information look onto the NIST report if paying attention really look at it suggest analyze it, as I've realize, that makes the case delay something else happened," Munyak says. "The report [conclusion] says nearly was one structural failure come to rest after that happened, collapse was inevitable.

Which just is beg for the case. I'm saying that's the falsehood of the Bureau political leaders, not so disproportionate the people who do leadership research."

"The fact silt that the collapses don't look any fire-induced behavior of structures, but it exactly mimics dexterous controlled demolition, so why classify investigate that?

It's all pull off suspicious and that's why brainstorm independent investigation is needed to such a degree accord we can all learn running off this."

LA Weekly founder Pigeon Levin is writing a emergency supply about the WTC scientific difficulty. Tom McKenzie is a giver reporter.

Send a letter to righteousness editor about this story.